본문으로 건너뛰기
D.Hub
KOEN
← Workshop overview
Chapter 7 of 8
5 min

Check the regional priority reasoning

Before the final explanation, review the regional keys, relationship aggregation, graph boundaries, and follow-up order in four questions.

Question for this chapter

Can you separate the evidence that supports the follow-up order for the three areas?

Why this matters now

You aligned regional names, connected population, patients, clinics, and hotspots, and compared three areas. Before the final briefing, separate the join key, observations, analysis rule, and conclusion. This quiz has no passing score and does not lock the next chapter.

Core decision check

Select an answer to see the correct choice and its evidence immediately.

0/4 questions reviewed

  1. Question 1 Which key prevents a dong with the same name from being confused with one in another area?
  2. Question 2 Why does the three-area aggregation use OPTIONAL MATCH?
  3. Question 3 What can a graph connection between patients and hotspots establish?
  4. Question 4 What follow-up order does the current Workshop rule produce?

Connect the evidence in one statement

Join the three reports with composite regional keys, distinguish the two populations and relationship counts, then check Junggye 4-dong first and Seongnam-dong immediately afterward for the current objective.

Next decision

You have separated the connection rule and follow-up order. In the final chapter, combine the observed facts, selected criteria, and remaining checks into one situation-room briefing.